can police use cbd

December 15, 2021 By admin Off

All this confusion stems largely from these products’ close association with marijuana and the rapidly changing legal landscape surrounding its use. The umbrella species cannabis has a variety of strains, some plants have little THC (most commonly hemp) and others are high in THC (marijuana, or cannabis sativa).

Even those most versed in the technicalities can struggle with key distinctions. Mehler told NBC News that the Drug Enforcement Administration agent who took on the case against his client incorrectly testified in courtthat the law defined hemp as containing 0.03 percent THC when it’s actually 0.3 percent. Mehler said even the 0.3 percent threshold is an infinitesimal amount of THC.

Confusing one decimal point nearly upended Mr. Gonzalez’s entire life. And it destroyed his cargo. Mehler said the hemp wasn’t properly stored by the authorities and had to be dumped.

Opinion How drugs finally won the War on Drugs in the 2010s.

“People are jumping into this industry feet first and consuming unknown quantities of CBD,” Mehler said. “A lot of these products are mislabeled, and there’s no understanding of what the potential long-term health consequences are.”

It’s not just government officials who are confused — and doling out consequences for using a substance they (wrongly) think is verboten. Take the experience of a school bus driver in Utah who used CBD oil to manage her stress and was fired after a drug screen came back positive for THC. She insists that she only used the non-intoxicating CBD product but tested as though she were using cannabis, which is illegal in Utah and definitely not permitted for school bus drivers. Because there’s little regulatory oversight of these items, it’s possible that her CBD product still contained enough THC to trigger a positive result.

It’s not just government officials who are confused — and doling out consequences for using a substance they (wrongly) think is verboten.

And an even larger group of people is currently in jeopardy than those working in the field: people seeking alternative approaches to chronic health conditions by using hemp, CBD and other low-concentration THC products. (Unlike THC, which produces a “high,” CBD (cannabidiol) is a non-intoxicating chemical compound called a cannabinoid that offers a host of potential health benefits.)

The FDA’s efforts to enforce its CBD rules — mostly aimed at mislabeling and weeding out bogus health claims — have been essentially limited to sternly worded letters addressed to businesses running afoul of marketing guidelines. A 2017 study shows that’s a lot of companies, leaving the FDA with a full plate. The researchers found that nearly 70 percent of all CBD products sold online are mislabeled, “causing potential serious harm to its consumers.”

But companies engaging in sloppy manufacturing or false advertising aren’t the only ones responsible. There’s also a lack of reliable research for businesses and consumers to use. In the case of the bus driver’s positive drug screen, for instance, there’s conflicting scientific findings as to whether, in certain acidic conditions, CBD can break down and convert to THC in the body. (The World Health Organization, for its part, has concluded that there’s no evidence of public health problems stemming from the use of “pure CBD.”)

The lab analysis detailed how the hemp — marijuana’s non-intoxicating but lookalike plant cousin — contained less than 0.3 percent THC (the psychoactive ingredient in marijuana), meaning it’s a legal substance. But the report wasn’t enough to keep the law enforcement officer from arresting him.


In another case, a California couple trying to treat their daughter’s epilepsy with CBD oil was charged with “severe medical neglect” by the state’s Child Protective Services and temporarily lost custody of her. Thankfully, after the courts reviewed research showing the substance they were using can treat severe forms of the disorder (it’s the first FDA-approved medication with CBD), the case was dismissed.

In the case of CBD, whether you’re purchasing gas station curiosities or an expensive facial moisturizer, you don’t really know what’s in it. The product can contain more THC than what’s federally allowed, and after frequent dosing can potentially trigger a positive drug screen.

Companies engaging in sloppy manufacturing or false advertising aren’t the only ones responsible. There’s also a lack of reliable research for businesses and consumers to use.

Unless these issues are addressed, people will keep losing their jobs for no reason, delivery drivers will continue being jailed and patients seeking alternative treatments will remain in the dark about what they’re actually taking.

Cannabis sativa is illegal under federal law, though increasingly not under state statutes; byproducts of hemp (such as CBD) are legal to grow, sell and possess nationwide under changes unveiled in the 2018 Farm Bill. That measure removed hemp plants that contain less than 0.3 percent THC from the Controlled Substances Act, and treats hemp like any other agricultural commodity. Some states like South Dakota, however, have opted out of the federal law and prohibit hemp and CBD.

What new CBD guidelines mean for consumers.

When Anuedy Gonzalez was pulled over outside of Amarillo, Texas, on Dec. 6, he was prepared. He handed the highway trooper a lab report showing that the 3,350 pounds of hemp he was transporting from California to New York was perfectly legal under both Texas state law and federal law. But that didn’t keep him from spending Christmas in jail and facing federal drug trafficking charges that carried a potential life sentence.

Compounding these complicated distinctions are the scientific and regulatory gaps facing the industry. The chronically underresourced and increasingly toothless FDA has few enforcement mechanisms in place to carry out its mandate: ensuring the products we put into our bodies are correctly labeled and safe for consumption.

Though the charges were eventually dismissed, Gonzalez’s experience shows how confusing and risky it is to work in the industries using marijuana-adjacent products such as hemp and CBD as laws and regulations rapidly evolve — or don’t exist at all. The Food and Drug Administration needs to get to work and law enforcement officers need to get trained so those who use these products aren’t wrongly punished.

Daniel Mehler, a Colorado attorney who defended Gonzalez in Texas and is a student of cannabis pharmacology, contends that research has been stymied because of historic prohibitions on cannabis. As a result, knowledge lags far behind the industry’s popularity and health claims made by companies, which research estimates could rake in $20 billion by 2024.

While scientists pursue answers, the job of law enforcement has become complicated. From a policing perspective, telling the difference between smokable hemp (legal) and smokable cannabis (illegal in states that include Texas) isn’t so simple for the naked eye, likely requiring lab tests to determine the potency.

Zachary Siegel is a freelance journalist in Chicago. He covers public health and criminal justice.

You have the right to require the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) to review their decision.

What is the Met’s Policy on officers taking LEGAL CBD oil?

We couldn’t load the mail server logs for this message.

As you will know, CBD oil is legal in the UK as a food supplement providing the amount of THC is under 0.2%. Whilst the user of the CBD oil places trust in the company selling the CBD oil to ensure THC does not exceed 0.2%, I wish to know:

Your request will now be considered in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (the Act). You will receive a response within the statutory timescale of 20 working days as defined by the Act.

1 Attachment.

Dear Metropolitan Police Service (MPS),

Freedom of Information Request Reference No: 01/FOI/20/013657.

Are you unhappy with how your request has been handled or do you think the decision is incorrect?

If you have any further enquiries concerning this matter, please contact us at [email address] or on the phone at 0207 161 3500, quoting the reference number above. Should your enquiry relate to the logging or allocations process we will be able to assist you directly and where your enquiry relates to other matters (such as the status of the request) we will be able to pass on a message and/or advise you of the relevant contact details.

This request has been closed to new correspondence . Contact us if you think it should be reopened.

I wish to make this FOI request relating to CBD oil.

The Information Commissioner.

Complaints should be made in writing, within forty (40) working days from the date of the refusal notice, and addressed to:

What is the Met’s Policy on officers taking LEGAL CBD oil?

Prior to lodging a formal complaint you are welcome to discuss the response with the case officer who dealt with your request.

Would police officers be disciplined or sacked if THC shows on a drugs test – even if it is 0.2%?

Information Rights Unit PO Box 313 Sidcup DA15 0HH United Kingdom.

Our Ref: 01/FOI/20/013657.

If you are dissatisfied with the handling procedures or the decision of the MPS made under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (the Act) regarding access to information you can lodge a complaint with the MPS to have the decision reviewed.

Would police officers be disciplined or sacked if THC shows on a drugs test – even if it is 0.2%?

I write in connection with your request for information which was received by the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) on 24/02/2020. I note you seek access to the following information:

Information Rights Unit.

The request was successful .

In all possible circumstances the MPS will aim to respond to your complaint within 20 working days.

After lodging a complaint with the MPS if you are still dissatisfied with the decision you may make application to the Information Commissioner for a decision on whether the request for information has been dealt with in accordance with the requirements of the Act.