cbd size ultrasound

December 15, 2021 By admin Off

Statistical Analysis: Univariable analysis with measures of frequency and standard deviation and bivariable analysis using correlation.

We studied a total of 200 subjects; wherein an equal proportion belonged to either sex. The study subjects belonged to the age group 18-85 years of age; the mean age was 34.5 years (SD 13.24 years). A majority of the participants belonged to the age group 18-25 years. The mean age for males was 35.8 years while that for females was 33.1 years. This difference in ages was not statistically significant.

Ultrasonographic measurement of CBD at three locations.

Vivek Lal.

The size of the common bile duct is a predictor of biliary obstruction and it’s measurement is therefore an important component in the evaluation of the biliary system. Availability of normal measurements of the common bile duct would help to distinguish obstructive from non-obstructive causes of jaundice.

However, some authors like Reinus et al., [15] have reported no relation of common bile duct diameter with age.

1 Demonstrator, Department of Anatomy, College of Medicine & Sagore Dutta Hospital, Kolkata, India.

2 Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Hospital, Jaipur, India.

We did not find any statistically significant correlation of common bile duct diameter with sex. This finding was similar to other studies by Niederau et al., [9], Admassie [11], Reinus et al., [15], Adibi and Givechian [19], Brogna et al., [20] and El Sharkawy E et al., [23].

Results : Mean age of study subjects was 34.5 years (Range 18-85 years). Mean diameters of the common bile duct in the three locations were: proximal, 4.0 mm (SD 1.02 mm); middle, 4.1 mm (SD 1.01 mm); and distal, 4.2 mm (SD 1.01 mm) and overall mean for all measures 4.1 mm (SD 1.01 mm). Average diameter ranged from 2.0 mm to 7.9 mm, with 95 percent of the subjects having a diameter of less than 6 mm. We observed a statistically significant relation of common bile duct with age, along with a linear trend. There was no statistically significant difference in common bile duct diameter between male and female subjects. The diameter did not show any statistically significant correlation with any of the anthropometric measurements.

Materials and Methods.

Ultrasonography is an accurate, safe, non-invasive and inexpensive imaging modality, which is highly sensitive and specific for the detection of many biliary tree diseases [1]. Ultrasonography is comparable in accuracy to oral cholecystography, radionuclide studies, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, and more cost-effective [2].

Further, we applied a test for linear trend on the age-wise distribution of common bile duct diameter. This was found to be statistically significant (p = 0.003), with an F-statistic of 8.78.

Height was measured using a stadiometer with a sensitivity of 0.1 centimeter. The weighing scale with a sensitivity of 0.1 kg was used to measure weight. Chest circumference was measured using a measuring tape over light clothing and while breathing normally. In the males, the measurement was made at the widest point of the chest; in the females, the measurement was made at the level of the nipples with the measuring tape held horizontally. The circumference at the transpyloric plane was measured at a level midway between the suprasternal notch (at the upper border of manubrium between the sternal heads of sternomastoid muscles) and the symphysis pubis (at the lower end of median line). Circumference at the umbilicus was obtained by measuring the abdominal circumference using measuring tape at the level of the umbilicus. Circumference at the hip was measured with the measuring tape positioned around the maximum circumference of the buttocks.

The mean diameters of the common bile duct in the three locations were: proximal, 4.0 mm (SD 1.02 mm); middle, 4.1 mm (SD 1.01 mm); and distal, 4.2 mm (SD 1.01 mm). The overall mean for all measures was 4.1 mm, with a standard deviation of 1.01 mm. All the three diameters were highly correlated and statistically significant (p-value<0.001). While the lower limit of common bile duct diameter among the normal subjects was 2.0 mm, the upper limit was found to be 7.9 mm. However, 95% of the study participants showed a common bile duct diameter of < 6 mm.


Materials and Methods: Study included 200 participants with equal proportion belonging to either sex. Common bile duct was measured at three locations- at the porta hepatis, in the most distal aspect of head of pancreas and mid-way between these points. Anthropometric measurements including height, weight, chest circumference, circumference at transpyloric plane, circumference at umbilicus and circumference at hip were obtained using standard procedures.

The mean common bile duct diameters of proximal and distal parts were 4.0 mm (SD 1.02 mm) and 4.2 mm (SD 1.01 mm), respectively. A strong correlation was found between proximal and distal part of CBD due to constant diameter. Similar correlation has been reported by Adibi and Givechian [19] and Niederau et al., [9].

In a study conducted in Jordan, Daradkeh et al., [22] demonstrated a significant correlation with body mass index (BMI). A correlation of common bile duct diameter with BMI was also reported by Adibi and Givechian [19]. However, no such correlation was reported in a study by Brogna et al., [20].

The mean diameter of common bile duct was observed to be 4.1 mm (SD 0.95 mm) for males and 4.0 mm (SD 1.07 mm) for females. This difference was tested by applying independent samples t -test. The t value was 0.86, which was not found to be statistically significant (p = 0.38).

In order to assess the association between common bile duct diameter and anthropometric measurements, both of which were continuous variables, correlation was used.

Gurusamy K, Sahay SJ, Burroughs AK, Davidson BR. Systematic review and meta-analysis of intraoperative versus preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with gallbladder and suspected common bile duct stones. Br J Surg . 2011 Jul. 98(7):908-16. [Medline].

Julliard O, Hauters P, Possoz J, Malvaux P, Landenne J, Gherardi D. Incisional hernia after single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: incidence and predictive factors. Surg Endosc . 2016 Oct. 30(10):4539-43. [Medline].

Wang HH, Liu M, Clegg DJ, Portincasa P, Wang DQ. New insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying effects of estrogen on cholesterol gallstone formation. Biochim Biophys Acta . 2009 Nov. 1791(11):1037-47. [Medline]. [Full Text].

Gilani SN, Bass G, Leader F, Walsh TN. Collins’ sign: validation of a clinical sign in cholelithiasis. Ir J Med Sci . 2009 Dec. 178(4):397-400. [Medline].

Center SA. Diseases of the gallbladder and biliary tree. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract . 2009 May. 39(3):543-98. [Medline].

Related Questions:

See Imaging of Cholelithiasis for complete information on this topic.

Machado FHF, Castro Filho HF, Babadopulos RFAL, Rocha HAL, Rocha JLC, Moraes Filho MO. Ursodeoxycholic acid in the prevention of gallstones in patients subjected to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass1. Acta Cir Bras . 2019 Feb 14. 34(1):e20190010000009. [Medline].

[Guideline] Tazuma S, Unno M, Igarashi Y, et al. Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for cholelithiasis 2016. J Gastroenterol . 2017 Mar. 52(3):276-300. [Medline].

Pineda O, Maydon HG, Amado M, et al. A prospective study of the conservative management of asymptomatic preoperative and postoperative gallbladder disease in bariatric surgery. Obes Surg . 2017 Jan. 27(1):148-53. [Medline].

Diehl AK. Gallstone size and the risk of gallbladder cancer. JAMA . 1983 Nov 4. 250(17):2323-6. [Medline].

Shaffer EA. Epidemiology and risk factors for gallstone disease: has the paradigm changed in the 21st century?. Curr Gastroenterol Rep . 2005 May. 7(2):132-40. [Medline].

Poupon R, Rosmorduc O, Boelle PY, et al. Genotype-phenotype relationships in the low-phospholipid-associated cholelithiasis syndrome: a study of 156 consecutive patients. Hepatology . 2013 Sep. 58(3):1105-10. [Medline].

Reuters Health. Endoscopic ultrasound a good first step when gallstones are suspected. Medscape Medical News. January 10, 2014. Available at http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/819024. Accessed: January 20, 2014.

Schirmer BD, Winters KL, Edlich RF. Cholelithiasis and cholecystitis. J Long Term Eff Med Implants . 2005. 15(3):329-38. [Medline].

Behar J, Corazziari E, Guelrud M, Hogan W, Sherman S, Toouli J. Functional gallbladder and sphincter of oddi disorders. Gastroenterology . 2006 Apr. 130(5):1498-509. [Medline].


Stogryn S, Metcalfe J, Vergis A, Hardy K. Does ultrasongraphy predict intraoperative findings at cholecystectomy? An institutional review. Can J Surg . 2016 Feb. 59(1):12-8. [Medline].

Yao CC, Huang SM, Lin CC, et al. Assessment of common bile duct using laparoscopic ultrasound during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech . 2009 Aug. 19(4):317-20. [Medline].

Khan AS, Eloubeidi MA, Khashab MA. Endoscopic management of choledocholithiasis and cholelithiasis in patients with cirrhosis. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol . 2016 Jul. 10(7):861-8. [Medline].

Jaruvongvanich V, Sanguankeo A, Upala S. Significant association between gallstone disease and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Dis Sci . 2016 Aug. 61(8):2389-96. [Medline].

Shapiro T, Melzer E, Binder Y, et al. Selective utilization of pre-operative endoscopic ultrasound to exclude choledocholithiasis prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a retrospective study. Hepatogastroenterology . 2013 May. 60(123):456-60. [Medline].

Zhang YP, Li WQ, Sun YL, Zhu RT, Wang WJ. Systematic review with meta-analysis: coffee consumption and the risk of gallstone disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther . 2015 Sep. 42(6):637-48. [Medline].

[Guideline] Overby DW, Apelgren KN, Richardson W, Fanelli R. SAGES guidelines for the clinical application of laparoscopic biliary tract surgery. Surg Endosc . 2010 Oct. 24(10):2368-86. [Medline]. [Full Text].

Le VH, Smith DE, Johnson BL. Conversion of laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy in the current era of laparoscopic surgery. Am Surg . 2012 Dec. 78(12):1392-5. [Medline].

[Guideline] NIH state-of-the-science statement on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for diagnosis and therapy. NIH Consens State Sci Statements . 2002 Jan 14-16. 19(1):1-26. [Medline].

Dauer M, Lammert F. Mandatory and optional function tests for biliary disorders. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol . 2009. 23(3):441-51. [Medline].

Dan DV, Harnanan D, Maharaj R, Seetahal S, Singh Y, Naraynsingh V. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: analysis of 619 consecutive cases in a Caribbean setting. J Natl Med Assoc . 2009 Apr. 101(4):355-60. [Medline].

Mahid SS, Jafri NS, Brangers BC, Minor KS, Hornung CA, Galandiuk S. Meta-analysis of cholecystectomy in symptomatic patients with positive hepatobiliary iminodiacetic acid scan results without gallstones. Arch Surg . 2009 Feb. 144(2):180-7. [Medline].

Goubault P, Brunel T, Rode A, Bancel B, Mohkam K, Mabrut JY. Low-phospholipid associated cholelithiasis (LPAC) syndrome: a synthetic review. J Visc Surg . 2019 Mar 25. [Medline].

Williams TP, Dimou FM, Adhikari D, Kimbrough TD, Riall TS. Hospital readmission after emergency room visit for cholelithiasis. J Surg Res . 2015 Aug. 197(2):318-23. [Medline].

Portincasa P, Moschetta A, Palasciano G. Cholesterol gallstone disease. Lancet . 2006 Jul 15. 368(9531):230-9. [Medline].